Definition of Numbers of Credit Risk Grading
A
clear definition of the different categories of
Credit Risk Grading is given as follows:
|
Risk Rating |
Grade |
Definition |
|
Superior – Low Risk |
1 |
Facilities are fully secured by cash deposits Government bonds or a counter guarantee from a top tier international bank. All security documentation should be in place. |
|
Good – Satisfactory Risk |
2 |
The repayment capacity of the borrower is strong. The borrower should have excellent liquidity and low leverage. The company should demonstrate consistently strong earnings and cash flow. All security documentation should be in place. Aggregate Score of 95 or greater based on the Risk Grade Scorecard. |
|
Acceptable – Fair Risk |
3 |
Adequate financial condition though may
not be able to sustain any major or
continued setbacks. These
borrowers
are not as strong as Grade 2 borrowers, but should still demonstrate consistent earnings, cash flow and have a good track record An Aggregate Score of 75-94 based on the Risk Grade Scorecard. |
|
Marginal – Watch list |
4 |
Grade 4 assets warrant greater attention due to conditions affecting the borrower, the industry or the Economic environment. |
|
| These borrowers have an above average risk due to strained liquidity, higher than normal leverage, thin cash flow and/or inconsistent earnings. Aggregate Score of
65-74
based on the Risk Grade Scorecard. |
|
|
Special Mention |
5 |
Grade 5 assets have potential weaknesses that deserve management‘s close attention. If left uncorrected, these weaknesses may result in a deterioration of the repayment prospects of the borrower An Aggregate Score of
55-64 based on the Risk Grade Scorecard. |
|
Substandard |
6 |
Financial condition is weak and capacity or inclination to repay is in doubt Loans should be downgraded to 6 if loan payments remain past due for 60-90 days Not yet considered non-performing as the correction of the deficiencies may result in an improved condition, and interest can still be taken into profits. An Aggregate Score of 45-54 based on the Risk Grade Scorecard. |
|
Doubtful and Bad (non-
performing) |
7 |
Full repayment of principal and interest is unlikely and the possibility of loss is extremely high. However, due to specifically identifiable pending
factors, such as
litigation, liquidation procedures or
capital injection, the asset is not yet classified as Loss. The adequacy of provisions must be reviewed at least quarterly on all non-performing loans, and the bank should pursue legal options to enforce security to obtain repayment or negotiate an appropriate loan rescheduling. In all cases, the requirements of Bangladesh Bank in CIB reporting, loan rescheduling and provisioning must be followed.
An
Aggregate
Score of
35-44 based on the Risk Grade Scorecard |
|
Loss (non-
performing) |
8 |
Assets graded 8 are long outstanding with no progress in obtaining repayment (in excess of 180 days past due) or in the late stages of wind up/liquidation. The prospect of recovery is poor and legal options have been pursued. The proceeds expected from
the liquidation or realization of security may be awaited. The continuance of the loan as a bankable asset is not warranted An Aggregate Score of 35 or
less
based |