• Industrial Sickness contributes to high cost economy. This in turn, will affect the competitiveness of the economy at home and abroad.
• Dead investment is a burden on both banks and
budgets and ultimately consumers should
pay the high cost.
• Money locked
up in sick units gives no returns and effects the availability of resources to the other viable units
Majority ot sick units is
retrievable in order to tackle the problem of sickness from the two angles the role of three agencies
assumes significance:
A) The government
13) Financial institutions and
C) the industry associations
A) The Role of
Government: If
the number of units in the country has increased some 10 times since independence and if
we have diversified industrial structure with wide spread entrepreneurship the credit for
this largely belongs to government. Second area where the government can be
helpful is Vis-a-vis industrial licensing. The very existence of licensing and monopoly regulation
legislation implies that there is a stampede to "to get in" whenever licensing is liberalized
for an industry or an economy as a whole
B) The Role of
Financial Institutions: The following are the ways by which sickness can be prevented by financial
institutions : a) Continuous monitoring of unit, b) Careful project appraisal c) Professional institutional response to
unit's problems d) Required systems at client
units e) Incentives to units to remain healthy.
C) The Role Of Industry Associations : A good practical review by each
industry association
of installed and usable capacity in the industry , capacity utilization , growth trends , problems etc should be
useful for the potential new entrants for deciding whether to enter the industry or not. The industry can have
some sort of 1 st aid cell this could consist
of professionals who could go to the aid of a unit that is beginning to fall
with the offer of managerial and
technical help also.
(3) Profitability
Index (PI)
(ii) Ranking of the 5(five) projects in terms of
Profitability Index (PI) are as follows:
Project |
PI |
Rating |
Project C |
1.35 |
1 |
Project B |
1.31 |
2 |
Project A |
1.27 |
3 |
Pro'ect D |
1.22 |
4 |
, Pr~ject E |
0.94 |
5 |
(i) Ranking of the 5(five)
projects in terms of Internal Rate of Return(IRR) are as follows:
Project |
NPV |
Rating |
Project
D |
-22% |
1 |
Project
C |
20% |
2 |
Project A |
18% |
3 |
Project B |
16% |
4 |
Project
E |
8% |
5 |
(4) The ranking in terms of Net Present Value (NPV)
should be given preference. Because
(i) NPV gives accurate results because of
consider all cash flows,
(ii) IRR gives misleading in non conventional investment project.
(iii) IRR also gives
multiple rates.
(iv) Profitability
Index(PI) is crude way to cope up the rate and it gives misleading if investment made reversal time.
(5) If capital rationing situation
prevails in the company with a budget constraints of the 1.5 million, we should
prefer project A and Project D
Because
(i) Project A gives
higher NPV
(ii) Project D gives highest IRR
(iii) Since Project B
gives second highest NPV but it takes 12 years
(iv) In considering PI the Project C is
the best but some portion of our investment is
being idle if project C is chosen.
SO project A and D would be best
preference.
(6) The causes of difference in
outcomes of the project under NPV and IRR methods are as follows:
(i) NPV consider cash flows at
the cost of capital rate over the year but IRR deals re-investment rate that may not
prevail in the market.
(ii) If the outcome or inflows are
great in recent year and smaller in later year than IRR gives misleading
(iii) For non conventional project, IRR gives
misleading for that reason the difference is made.