Search

20 September, 2021

Interaction between monetary and fiscal policies

 Fiscal policy and monetary policy are the two tools used by the State to achieve its macroeconomic objectives. While the main objective of fiscal policy is to increase the aggregate output of the economy, the main objective of the monetary policies is to control the interest and inflation rates. The fiscal policies have an impact on the goods market and the monetary policies have an impact on the asset markets and since the two markets are connected to each other via the two macrovariables — output and interest rates, the policies interact while influencing the output or the interest rates.

There is a dilemma as to whether these two policies are complementary, or act as substitutes to each other for achieving macroeconomic goals. Policy makers are viewed to interact as strategic substitutes when one policy maker's expansionary (contractionary) policies are countered by another policy maker's contractionary (expansionary) policies. For example: if the fiscal authority raises taxes or cuts spending, then the monetary authority reacts to it by lowering the policy rates and vice versa. If they behave as strategic complements,then an expansionary (contractionary) policy of one authority is met by expansionary (contractionary) policies of other. The issue of interaction and the policies being complement or substitute to each other arises only when the authorities are independent of each other. But when, the goals of one authority is made subservient to that of others, then the dominant authority solely dominates the policy making and no interaction worthy of analysis would arise.Also, it is worthy to note that fiscal and monetary policies interact only to the extent of influencing the final objective. So long as the objectives of one policy is not influenced by the other, there is no direct interaction between them.

Active and passive monetary and fiscal policies

1) Passive fiscal policy is one in which the authority raises or reduces taxes to balance the budget intertemporally. 2) Active fiscal policy is one in which the tax and spending levels are determined independent of intertemporal budget consideration. 3) Active monetary policy is one that pursues its inflation target independent of fiscal policies. 4) Passive monetary policy is one that sets interest rates to accommodate fiscal policies.  In case of an active fiscal policy and a passive monetary policy, the economy faces an expansionary fiscal shock that raises the price levels and money growth as monetary authority is forced to accommodate these shocks. But in case both the authorities are active, then the expansionary pressures created by the fiscal authority is contained to some extent by the monetary policies.

Supply shock

During a negative supply shock, the fiscal and monetary authorities are seen to follow conflicting policies as the fiscal authorities would follow expansionary policies to bring the output at its original state while the monetary authorities would follow contractionary policies so as to reduce the inflation created due to shortage in output caused by the supply shock.

Demand shock

During a demand shock (a sudden significant rise or fall in aggregate demand due to external factors) without a corresponding change in output that results in inflation or deflation which can also be termed as inflation or a deflation shock, it is observed that the two policies work in harmony. Both the authorities would follow expansionary policies in case of a negative demand shock in order to bring back the demand at its original state while they would follow contractionary policies during a positive demand shock in order to reduce the excess aggregate demand and bring inflation under control.

Cost push shocks

A cost-push shock is defined as a change in inflation that is not a result of pressures in the economy. The macroeconomic goal under such a situation is to optimise between reducing inflation and reducing the gap between the actual output and the desired level of output. A contractionary monetary policy under such a scenario raises the real interest rates which in turn not only reduces consumption thereby dampening aggregate demand and inflation but also raises the labour supply as workers are willing to sacrifice current leisure along with current consumption. This further dampens the inflation rates.

Outline the differences between a perfectly competitive market and a monopoly market

 Perfect Competitive Market: A market with perfect competition is where there are a very large number of buyers and sellers who are buying and selling an identical product. Since the product is identical in all its features, the price charged by all sellers is a uniform price. Economic theory describes market players in a perfect competition market as not being large enough by themselves to be able to become a market leader or to set prices. Since the products sold and prices set are identical, there are no barriers to entry or exit within such a market place.

Monopoly market (Dec'13): A Monopoly market is one where there are a large number of buyers but a very few number of sellers. The players in these types of markets sell goods which are different to each other and, therefore, are able to charge different prices depending on the value of the product that is offered to the market. In a monopolistic competition situation, since there are only a few numbers of sellers, one larger seller controls the market, and therefore, has control over prices, quality and product features.

Difference between Perfect Competition and Monopoly Competition: Perfect and Monopoly competition marketplaces have similar objectives of trading which is maximizing profitability and avoid making losses. However, the market dynamics between these two forms of markets are quite distinct. Monopoly competition describes an imperfect market structure quite opposite to perfect competition. Perfect competition explains an economic theory of a marketplace which does not happen to exist in reality.

Perfect Competition vs Monopoly Competition

Perfect and Monopoly competitions are both forms of market situations that describe the levels of competition within a market structure.

A market with perfect competition is where there are a very large number of buyers and sellers who are buying and selling an identical product.

A Monopoly market is one where there are a large number of buyers but a very few number of sellers. The players in these types of markets sell goods which are different to each other, and therefore, are able to charge different prices. Monopoly competition describes an imperfect market structure quite opposite to perfect competition. Perfect competition explains an economic theory of a marketplace which does not happen to exist in reality.

Explain the relationship of economics with (i) Sociology (ii) Statistics and (iii) Political science./ explain why the knowledge of statistics is indispensable for modern economic analysis

Explain why the knowledge of statistics is indispensable for modern economic analysis ?  

 i) Relationship between sociology and economics: Sociology and Economics as social sciences have close relations. Relationship between the two is so close that one is often treated as the branch of the other, because society is greatly influenced by economic factors, and economic processes are largely determined by the environment of the society.

Economics deals with the economic activities of man. It deals with production, consumption and distribution of wealth. The economic factors play a vital role in the very aspect of our social life. Total development of individual depends very much on economic factors. Without economic conditions, the study of society is quite impossible. All the social problems are directly connected with the economic conditions of the people. That is why Marshall defines Economics as "on one side the study of wealth and on the other and more important side a part of the study of man."

In the same way Economics is influenced by Sociology. Without the social background the study of Economics is quite impossible.

ii) Relationship between statistics and economics: Statistics and Economics have close relations. Relationship between the two is so close that one is often treated as the branch of the other, because statistics is greatly influenced by data and information. Economics would be dependent on those data.

Economics deals with the economic activities of man. It deals with production, consumption and distribution of wealth, where production is directly related to statistics. Without economic conditions, the study of statistics is quite impossible.

 

iii) Relationship between political science and economics: Political science and economics are social sciences. Political science is the study of politics in theory and practice, while economics is the study of how resources are produced, allocated, and distributed. As well as dealing with subjects that often relate to one another in everyday life, the two are commonly seen as sister subjects in academic terms.

A variety of topics related to politics are addressed by political science. This includes differing political philosophies about how society should operate. It also includes the way political systems work to produce laws and government.

Economics deals with two main areas. Microeconomics is the study of how individual consumers and businesses make production, purchasing, investment, and saving choices. Macroeconomics looks at how an entire economy works and the way policies can affect the combined effects of microeconomic decisions. It can be argued that economics is a social science rather than a pure science, because it is based around resolving an irresolvable dilemma: how to meet people's unlimited wants with limited resources.

Distinguish between micro-economics and macro-economic

Difference between Microeconomics and Macroeconomics:

Microeconomics

1) It is that branch of economics which deals with the economic decision-making of individual economic agents such as the producer, the consumer, etc; 2) It takes into account small components of the whole economy. 3) It deals with the price-determination in case of individual products and factors of production. 4) It is known as price theory (since it explains the process of allocation of economic resources along alternative; 5) It is concerned with the optimisation goals of individual consumers and producers (e.g., individual consumers are utility-maximisers, while individual producers are profit-maximisers). 6) It studies the flow of economic resources or factors of production from any individual owner of such resources to any individual user of these resources, etc. 7) Microeconomic theories help us in formulating appropriate policies for resource allocation at the firm level. 8) It takes into account the aggregates over homogeneous or similar products (e.g., the supply of steel in an economy).

Macroeconomics

1) It is that branch of economics which deals with aggregates and averages of the entire economy, e.g., aggregate output, national income, aggregate savings and investment, etc. 2) It takes into consideration the economy of any country as a whole. 3) It deals with general price-level in any economy. (lines of production on the basis of relative prices of various goods and services). 4) It is also known as the income theory (since it explains the changing levels of national income in any economy during any particular time period). 5) It is concerned with the optimisation of the growth process of the entire economy. 6) It studies the circular flow of income and expenditure between different sectors of the economy (say, between the firm sector and household sector). 7) Macroeconomic theories help us in formulating appropriate policies for controlling inflation (i.e., rising price-level), unemployment, etc. 8) It takes into account the aggregates over heterogeneous or dissimilar products (say, the Gross Domestic Product of any country during any year.

External Trade and the Balance of Payments - the Overall Situation

 In the external sector, the Current Account Balance (CAB) continued to be in surplus reflecting the increasing inflows of remittances bolstered by continued export expansion and declining imports. Import growth was sluggish in FY13, partly reflecting the significant fall in food import demand, lower petroleum imports as well as slower demand for imports related to manufacturing output.

Remittances were buoyed by larger numbers of Bangladeshi workers moving abroad in FY12 as well as real wage growth in the Middle East following the 'Arab Spring' events. Remittance growth of 12.6 percent in FY13 is higher than the 10.2 percent growth in FY12, though this growth did slow to 4.2 percent during the second half of the year compared to the first half of FY13 when remittance growth was 22 percent. This slow-down is a function of a 34 percent drop in the number of migrant workers between July-April FY13 relative to the same period in FY12. The capital account shows that foreign direct investment is projected to have increased from USD 1.2 billion in FY12 to USD 1.3 billion in FY13. Medium and long term loan disbursements rose from USD 1.5 billion in FY12 to USD 1.7 billion in FY13 and net aid flows increased from USD 671 million to USD 841 million during the same period. Improved external balances are reflected in the accumulation of international reserves to over USD 15 billion at the end of FY13, sufficient to cover 5.5 months of projected imports. The overall balance of payments surplus in FY13 was USD 5128 million.

Exports

Total exports in FY13 had a strong growth over the same period of FY12. Aggregate exports increased by 11.2 percent in FY13 to USD 27027.4 million from USD 24301.9 million in FY12. Apparels (woven garments and knitwear products) continued to occupy an overwhelming (above three fourth) share of the export basket in FY13.

Readymade garments

(woven and knitwear): Woven and knitwear products, which fetch about 79.6 percent of total export earnings, registered a high increase in receipts, from USD 19089.7 million of FY12 to USD 21515.8 million in FY13. Woven and Knitwear products grew by 15.0 percent and 10.4 percent respectively in FY13.

Frozen food

The frozen foods sector, comprising mainly of shrimps, registered marked decrease in earnings during FY13. Receipts from export of shrimp and fish decreased by 11.5 percent from USD 579.8 million of FY12 to USD 512.9 million in FY13.

Raw jute

In FY13, raw jute valued at USD 229.9 million was exported compared with USD 266.3 million in FY12, i.e. a 13.7 percent fall in exports during the year.

Jute goods (excluding carpets)

Jute products valued at USD 800.7 million was exported compared with USD 701.1 million in FY12 showing an increase of 14.2 percent in FY13.

Leather

Export earnings from leather and leather products increased by 21.0 percent to USD 399.7 million in FY13 from

USD 330.2 million in FY12.

Home Textile

Export earnings from home textile declined by 12.6 percent to USD 791.5 million in FY13 from USD 906.1 million in FY12.

Engineering products

These exports fell marginally from USD 375.5 million in FY12 to USD 367.5 million in FY13.

Chemical Products:

Export earnings from Chemical Products decreased by 9.7 percent to USD 93.0 million in FY13 against

USD 103.0 million in FY12.

Imports

Import payments (fob) in FY13 were USD 33576.0 million registering a positive growth of 0.8 percent compared to USD 33309.0 million in FY12. Table 10.2 shows the composition of imports; the major items are petroleum related products, wheat, textiles, raw cotton, edible oil, sugar, capital machinery, plastics, rubber and fertiliser. Food grains import decreased substantially by 19.4 percent to USD 726.0 million in FY13 (rice 89.6 percent) from USD 901.0 million in FY12 mainly due to adequate domestic supply of rice during the period. On the other hand wheat import increased by 13.5 percent to USD 696.0 million in FY13. Pulses, oil seeds, wheat, crude petroleum, chemicals, textile & articles thereof etc. recorded increases of imports during FY13. Imports of other food items recorded significant negative growth of 13.1 percent to 3128.0 million in FY 13 from USD 3600.0 million in FY12 (sugar 37.9 percent, edible oil 14.7 percent, spices 14.5 percent and milk & cream 3.2 percent). However, pulses recorded positive import growth of 73.7 percent during the year. Consumer and intermediate goods import 91recorded negative growth which decreased by 0.5 percent to USD 16694.0 million in FY13 from USD 16783.0 million in FY12 (fertiliser 14.0 percent, POL 7.1 percent, raw cotton 3.8 percent, clinker 3.4 percent, yarn 2.0 percent). Except iron, steel & other base metal, capital machinery and others under the category of capital goods and others showed negative import growth. Therefore, imports of capital goods and others decreased by 9.0 percent to USD 11031.0 million in FY13 from USD 12118.0 million in FY12 (others 13.0 percent and capital machinery 8.5 percent). However, imports by EPZ increased by 18.5 percent to USD 2505.0 million in FY13 compared to USD 2114.0 million in FY12. Workers' Remittances10.22 Despite continued global economic slowdown, the flow of inward remittances from Bangladeshi nationals working abroad remained strong in FY13 and continued to play an important role in strengthening the current account balance. Remittance inflow increased by 12.6 percent to USD 14338 million in FY13 from USD 12734 million in FY12. (Appendix-3, Table-XVI) However, as discussed above the rate of remittance growth sharply slowed down in the second half of FY13 compared with the first half.

Foreign Aid

Total official foreign aid disbursement increased by 31.0 percent to USD 2786 million in FY13 from USD 2126 million received in FY12 (Table 10.4). This was despite a decline in food aid which amounted to USD 20 million in FY13 against USD 69 million in FY12. The disbursement of project assistance stood at USD 2766 million in FY13, compared with USD 2057 million in FY12. Total outstanding official external debt as of 30 June 2013 was USD 23319 million (18.0 percent of GDP in FY13) against USD 22095 million as of 30 June 2012 (19.0 percent of GDP in FY12). Repayment of fficial external debt amounted to USD 1102 million (excluding repurchases from the IMF) in FY13. Out of the total repayments, principal payments amounted to USD 906 million while interest payments stood at USD 196 million in FY13, against USD 789 million and USD 200 million respectively during FY12. The debt-service ratio as percentage of exports was 4.1 percent in FY13.

Macroeconomic Performance of Bangladesh

 Growth Performance

Bangladesh's GDP growth rate of 6.0 percent in FY13 using the 1995-96 base, and 6.2 percent using the 2005-06 base, remain impressive. Growth in agriculture sector declined from 3.1 percent in FY12 to 2.2 percent in FY13. Growth in crops and horticulture sub-sector slid to 0.2 percent in FY13 from 2.0 percent in FY12, though growth in animal farming and forest and related services subsectors increased slightly during the period. Fishing sub-sector grew above 5.0 percent in FY13.

Industry sector grew slightly more at 9.0 percent in FY13 compared to 8.9 percent in FY12 driven in large part by faster growth in mining and quarrying, construction and small scale industries (Table 1.2). Mining and quarrying sub-sectors grew strongly by 11.1 percent in FY13 compared with 7.8 percent in FY12. Power, gas and water supply subsector demonstrated a lower growth of 8.6 percent in FY13 compared with 12.0 percent in FY12; however, the growth in FY13 remained above the long run trend.

Services sector growth decreased to 5.7 percent in FY13 from 6.0 percent in FY12 affected mainly by lower growth of wholesale and retail trade sub-sector. Wholesale and retail trade sub-sector, the major services sub-sector, declined to 4.7 percent in FY13 from 5.6 percent in FY12 reflecting weaker domestic demand. Growth rates of hotel and restaurants, transport, storage and communication, real estate, renting and other business activities, community, social and personal services subsectors increased slightly in FY13. On the other hand, growth rates of financial intermediation, public administration defense, health and social works sub-sectors edged down during the period. Education subsector grew strongly from 7.2 percent in FY12 to 9.7 percent in

FY13.

Savings and Investment

Gross fixed investment increased slightly to 26.8 percent of GDP in FY13 from 26.5 percent in FY12 due to increasing growth of public investment (Chart 1.1). During the same period, private investment decreased from 20.0 to 19.0 percent of GDP and public investment increased from 6.5 to 7.9 percent of GDP. National savings rates increased slightly from 29.2 percent of GDP in FY12 to 29.5 percent of GDP in FY13. Domestic savings as a percent of GDP remained unchanged at 19.3 percent in FY13. The domestic savings-investment gap as a percentage of GDP, correspondingly, increased from 7.2 percent in FY12 to 7.5 percent in FY13.

Price developments

The average inflation rate, using the FY06 new base, moderated to 6.8 percent at the end of FY13 from 8.7 percent at the end of FY12. Over this period, food and non-food inflation both decreased from 7.7 to 5.2 percent and from 10.2 to 9.2 percent respectively. The decrease in average inflation during FY13 was driven mainly by a gradual fall of food inflation until January 2013 when food inflation bottomed out at 3.2 percent. A steady decline in non-food inflation during the second half of FY13 also contributed to fall in average inflation. Though

average inflation went down, point-to-point inflation increased to 8.1 percent in FY13 from 5.6 percent in FY12.

Money and Credit Developments

In FY13, Bangladesh Bank designed its monetary policy stance based on assessment of global and domestic macroeconomic conditions and outlook. BB continued restrained policy stance in H1 of FY13 to curb inflation. In H2 of FY13 repo and reverse repo rates were decreased from 7.75 and 5.75 percent in FY12 to 7.25 and 5.25 percent respectively in FY13. Besides, Bangladesh Bank continued to maintain the Cash Reserve Ratio (CRR) and the Statutory Liquidity Ratio (SLR) for banks at 6.0 percent and 19.0 percent respectively.

Public Finance

Excluding grants, the overall budget deficit to GDP ratio increased from 4.1 percent in FY12 to 4.8 percent in FY13. However, domestic financing of the deficit decreased to 3.1 percent of GDP in FY13 from 3.3 percent of GDP in FY12.

External Sector

The exports earnings increased to USD 26566 million from USD 23989 million and import payments increased marginally to USD 33576 million from USD 33309 million in FY13 over FY12. Trade deficit declined to USD 7010 million in FY13 from USD 9320 million in FY12. The services and income account including primary income and secondary income registered a surplus of USD 9535 million due to a buoyant increasing remittance

inflows. Remittance inflows increased to USD 14338 million in FY13 from USD 12734 million in FY12. As a result, current account balance moved to a surplus of USD 2525 million as compared to a deficit of USD 447 million in FY12. The capital and financial account surplus continued to increase from USD 1918 million in FY12 to USD 3367 million in FY13, primarily due to increased flow of FDI, medium and long term loan disbursements and net trade credit. The capital account surplus increased from USD  482 million to USD 588 million during this period. While taking into account net errors and omissions, the overall balance of payments registered a huge surplus of USD 5128 million in FY13 compared to a surplus of USD 494 million in FY12. Gross international foreign exchange reserves at USD 15300 million at end of FY13 reflected improved external balances, representing 5.5 months of import cover.1.21 The export earnings, expressed as a percent of GDP, decreased from 20.7 percent in FY12 to 20.5 percent in FY13. The growth rate of exports earnings increased from 6.2 percent to 10.7 percent during this period. While leather, jute goods, knitwear and woven garments experienced a positive growth, some of the exports items like fish, shrimps, raw jute, tea, home textile and engineering products experienced a negative growth. Import payments, as a percent of GDP, decreased from 28.7 in FY12 to 25.9 in FY13. Imports grew at a rate of 0.8 percent in FY13 compared to the 2.4 percent growth in FY12. This lower growth of import payments resulted mainly from negative growth in imports of food grains, edible oil, sugar, POL, fertiliser, and capital machinery. However, imports of pulses, chemicals, textile & textile articles thereof and iron, steel & other base metals showed positive growth in FY13. The rate of growth of workers' remittance inflows increased by 12.6 percent in FY13 playing an important role in strengthening the current account balance. In order to achieve BB's monetary policy goal and to avoid undue volatility in the foreign exchange market, Bangladesh Bank remained vigilant by closely monitoring the exchange rate movements, and buying and selling of foreign exchanges. In FY13, Bangladesh Taka experienced appreciation of

5.2 percent against US dollar mainly due to strong growth in the flow of inward remittances, increase in export earnings and sluggish import payments. BB purchased USD 4539.0 million in order to mop up excess liquidity in the local foreign exchange market. The nominal exchange rate of Taka stood at Taka 77.77 per US dollar as of end June 2013 compared to Taka 81.82 per US dollar as of end June 2012. In nominal effective terms, against a trade weighted eight currency basket (base: 2000-01=100), Taka appreciated by 6.4 percent in FY13. The real

effective exchange rate of the Taka also appreciated by 11.3 percent as of end June 2013.

Macroeconomic Scenario of Bangladesh

 Economic Growth

Although the growth of Bangladesh economy slowed down in the context of negative growth in world trade at the beginning of the global financial crisis in FY 2008-09, next year this growth bounced back and average growth remained above 6 percent in the last three years. According to BBS, GDP grew to 6.71 in FY 2010-11 and the estimated GDP growth rate for FY 2011 -12 is 6.32 percent. However, because of high base effect induced by more than 5 percent growth in agriculture sector during the last two years, the growth of FY 2011-12 dipped a little which is still satisfactory. Alongside, substantial growth in industry and service sector has contributed to overall GDP growth. In FY2011-12, growth in agriculture, industry and service sectors has been

estimated to 2.53 percent, 9.47 percent and 6.06 percent respectively. This year GDP and GNI per capita stood at US$ 772 and US$ 848 which were US$ 748 and US$ 816 respectively in the last fiscal year.

Savings and Investment

Estimated domestic savings slightly increased from 19.3 percent of GDP in FY 2010-11 to 19.4 percent of GDP in FY 2011-12. Investment in FY 2011-12 also showed similar feature with a slight increase and stood at 25.4 percent of GDP in FY 2011-12 from 25.2 percent of GDP in FY2010-11. Of which the share of private investment stood at 19.1 percent of GDP while that of public investment was 6.3 percent in FY 2011-12. In FY 2010-11, the private and the public sector investments were 19.5 and 5.6 percent of GDP respectively. Major initiatives of the Government implemented in infrastructure sector including power and reduction in cost of doing business helped create investment-friendly environment. In addition to this, because of satisfactory growth of remittances, national savings in FY 2011-12 upturned to 29.4 percent of GDP from 28.8 percent of GDP in the previous year.

Inflation

The 12 month average inflation rate reached to 10.62 percent in FY 2011-12 which was 8.80 percent in FY 2010-11. Oil and food inflation in global market and excessive credit flows to unproductive sectors were mainly responsible for this upturn. Inflation on point to point basis in June 2012 stood at 8.56 percent. From the trend analysis of inflation in Bangladesh, it is clear that in the first half of FY 2011-2012 general inflation went up because of food inflation. However, at the end of FY2011-12, non-food inflation was the key factor in pushing general inflation upward. At this point in time, food inflation receded to 7.08 (monthly rate, point to point basis) percent from about 13 percent in the same month of FY2010-11. Satisfactory food production and supply of essential commodities including demand management through Open Market Sale (OMS) of the essential commodities and sufficient stock of food grains contributed to the efforts of pulling down food inflation. On the

other hand, there was a non-food inflationary pressure due to price hike in international market, depreciation in exchange rate and adjustment of oil price. In order to contain inflation, the Government has undertaken necessary steps by forging better coordination between fiscal and monetary policies. Although there was a pressure of oil price adjustment on food price, it was transitory. It is expected that actions like discouraging credit flows to unproductive sector alongside adopting restrained and effective monetary policy will reduce the inflationary pressure.

Fiscal Situation

Revenue A target for revenue receipt was set at Tk.1, 18,385 crore (12.94 percent of GDP) in FY 2011-12 of which NBR tax revenue accounted for Tk.9,1870.00 crore (10.0 percent of GDP), non-NBR revenue, Tk.3,915 crore (0.4 percent of GDP) and non-tax revenue Tk.22,600 crore (2.47 percent of GDP). Against these targets, tax revenue from NBR sources stood at Tk. 91,597 crore while revenue receipts from non-NBR source and non-

tax revenue receipts were Tk. 3,633 crore and Tk.18,550 core respectively in FY 2011-12. Total revenue receipts increased by 19.53 percent from Tk. 95,188 crore in FY 2010-11 to Tk.1,13,781 crore in FY 2011-

12.The growth of tax revenues from NBR sources was 17.47 percent in FY 2011-12 which was 20.95 percent in

FY 2010-11. During this period, VAT at import level registered a remarkable growth of 16.06 percent and VAT at local level17.48 percent and income tax 24.68 percent.

Money and Credit

During FY 2011-12, year on year growth in broad money (M2) and reserve money (RM) decreased by 17.39 per

cent and 8.99 percent respectively which was much lower than 21.34 percent and 21.09 percent growth in FY 2010-11. There was a deceleration in narrow money (M1) growth which was largely due to the sharp decrease in growth of both currency notes and coins with the public and demand deposit. Time deposit growth slightly decreased to 20.74 percent compared to the increase of 22.68 percent in the previous year. On the other hand, demand deposit decreased by 6.21 percent in FY2011-12 from 15.48 percent in FY 2010-11. The supply of broad money increased from Tk. 4,40,520.00 crore in FY 2010-11 to Tk. 5,17,109.50 crore in FY 2011-12. Similarly, the growth of domestic credit on year -on-year basis was 19.53 percent  during FY 2011-12, much lower than 27.43 percent during FY 2010-11. Sector-wise analysis of domestic credit indicates that the net credit to the government sector increased by 25.15 percent at the end of June 2012 compared to the growth of 35.01 percent during the previous year. The private sector credit growth was 19.72 percent in FY 2011-12, much lower than year -on-year growth of 25.84 percent of the previous fiscal year. Reserve money increased by 8.99 percent at the end of June 2012, as compared to 21.03 percent growth in the previous year. Due to an increase of 12.53 percent in net foreign assets (NFA) of Bangladesh Bank, the growth of reserve money was observed. However, net domestic assets (NDA) of Bangladesh Bank increased by only 1.17 percent during the period. Bangladesh Bank’s claims on other public sector, claims on government sector (net), deposit money banks (DMBs), and non-bank depository corporations (NBDCs) increased by 39.26 percent, 18.70 percent, 21.60 and 14.47 percent respectively which eventually pushed upwardthe growth of reserve money. On the other hand, net other assets also increased by 39.21 percent. Money multiplier increased to 5.29 in FY2012 as compared to 4.90 at the end of June 2011. This increase was attributable to the decline in reserve-deposit ratio and currency-deposit ratio.

Interest Rate

Bangladesh Bank conducted its liquidity management with an aim to contain inflation and support attaining inclusive growth. To this end, repo and reverse repo rates were raised twice by a total of 100 basis points to .75 and 5.75 percent respectively during FY 2011-12. There was a maximum cap of 7 percent interest rate on export credit fixed since January 10, 2004 to facilitate export earnings. Recently, the cap on interest rate on lending in all sectors other than pre-shipment export credit and agricultural loans has been withdrawn. This has brought competitiveness among banks in fixing rate of interest on lending in a rational manner. Banks are allowed to differentiate interest rate up to a maximum of 3 percent considering comparative risk elements involved among borrowers in the same lending category. With progressive deregulation of interest rates, banks have been advised to announce the mid-rate of the limit (if any) for different sectors and they may change interest 1.5 percent more or less than the announced mid-rate on the basis of the comparative credit risk. The weighted average rate of interest on commercial lending increased to 13.75 percent at the end of June 2012, from 12.42 percent at the end of June 2011. On the other hand, the deposit rate increased to 8.15 percent from 7.27 percent over the same period. As a result, the interest rate spread widened to 5.60 percent at the end of June 2012 from 5.15 percent at the end of June 2011.

Overseas Employment and Remittances

Although export of manpower slowed down in the first half of FY 2010-11 because of the impact of global recession, particularly on the real estate markets in the Middle East, and on industrial labour demand in some South East Asian economies such as Malaysia, it began to increase from January, 2011. The amount of remittances increased by 6.03 percent to US $ 11,650.32 million in FY 2010-11 compared to that of the previous year. Bangladesh earned remittancesof US$12,843.40 million in FY 2011-12 which was 10.24 percent higher than the amount of the previous year. The Government has undertaken several initiatives including diplomatic approaches to explore new markets. As a result, the rate of manpower export has started moving upward. As many as 6.91 lakh workers went abroad in quest of jobs in FY 2011-12, which was 57.40 percent higher than the number stood at in the previous year. In the recent past, there is an upward trend in both the number of manpower export and the amount of inward remittances to Bangladesh. The remittance sent by the Bangladeshi expatriates substantially increased to 11.11 percent of GDP which was again 52.92 percent of the total export earnings in FY 2011-12. During FY 2011-12, the highest amount of remittance (28.69 percent) came from Saudi Arabia keeping the trend as usual followed by the United Arab Emirates (18.72 percent), Kuwait (9.27 percent) and Malaysia (6.60 percent). Among the western and European countries, the United States of America secured the first position (11.67 percent), followed by the United Kingdom (7.69 percent). To begin manpower export in full swing to Africa, East Europe and Latin America, a number of diplomatic initiatives have been undertaken alongside establishing new labour wings in several countries. 

Market equilibrium

 Market equilibrium refers to a condition where a market price is established through competition such that the amount of goods or services sought by buyers is equal to the amount of goods or services produced by sellers. This price is often called the competitive price or market clearing price and will tend not to change unless demand or supply changes and the quantity is called "competitive quantity" or market clearing quantity.


 

Macroeconomics

 Macroeconomics (from the Greek prefix makro- meaning "large" and economics) is a branch of economics dealing with the performance, structure, behavior, and decision-making of an economy as a whole, rather than individual markets. This includes national, regional, and global economies. Macroeconomists study aggregated indicators such as GDP, unemployment rates, and price indices to understand how the whole economy functions. Macroeconomists develop models that explain the relationship between such factors as national income, output, consumption, unemployment, inflation, savings, investment, international trade and international finance.

Microeconomics

Microeconomics  (from Greek prefix mikro- meaning "small" and economics) is a branch of economics that studies the behavior of individual households and firms in making decisions on the allocation of limited resources (see scarcity). Typically, it applies to markets where goods or services are bought and sold. Microeconomics examines how these decisions and behaviors affect the supply and demand for goods and services, which determines prices, and how prices, in turn, determine the quantity supplied and quantity demanded of goods and services.

Discount window lending

 Central banks normally offer a discount window, where commercial banks and other depository institutions are able to borrow reserves from the Central Bank to meet temporary shortages of liquidity caused by internal or external disruptions. This creates a stable financial environment where savings and investment can occur, allowing for the growth of the economy as a whole.

The interest rate charged (called the 'discount rate') is usually set below short term interbank market rates. Accessing the discount window allows institutions to vary credit conditions (i.e., the amount of money they have to loan out), thereby affecting the money supply. Through the discount window, the central bank can affect the economic environment, and thus unemployment and economic growth.

DISCUSS GDP

Gross domestic product (GDP) is defined by OECD as "an aggregate measure of production equal to the sum of the gross values added of all resident institutional units engaged in production (plus any taxes, and minus any subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs)

GDP = compensation of employees + gross operating surplus + gross mixed income + taxes less subsidies on production and imports

GDP = COE + GOS + GMI + TP & MSP & M

  • Compensation of employees (COE) measures the total remuneration to employees for work done. It includes wages and salaries, as well as employer contributions to social security and other such programs.
  • Gross operating surplus (GOS) is the surplus due to owners of incorporated businesses. Often called profits, although only a subset of total costs are subtracted from gross output to calculate GOS.
  • Gross mixed income (GMI) is the same measure as GOS, but for unincorporated businesses. This often includes most small businesses.

 

Gross national product (GNP) is the market value of all the products and services produced in one year by labour and property supplied by the citizens of a country. Unlike Gross Domestic Product (GDP), which defines production based on the geographical location of production, GNP allocates production based on location of ownership.

GNP does not distinguish between qualitative improvements in the state of the technical arts (e.g., increasing computer processing speeds), and quantitative increases in goods (e.g., number of computers produced), and considers both to be forms of "economic growth".

Net national product (NNP) refers to gross national product (GNP), i.e. the total market value of all final goods and services produced by the factors of production of a country or other polity during a given time period, minus depreciation.[1] Similarly, net domestic product (NDP) corresponds to gross domestic product (GDP) minus depreciation.[2] Depreciation describes the devaluation of fixed capital through wear and tear associated with its use in productive activities.

In national accounting, net national product (NNP) and net domestic product (NDP) are given by the two following formulas:

NNP = GNP - Depreciation

NDP = GDP - Depreciation

cross-border comparison and PPP

The level of GDP in different countries may be compared by converting their value in national currency according to either the current currency exchange rate, or the purchasing power parity exchange rate.

  • Current currency exchange rate is the exchange rate in the international foreign exchange market.
  • Purchasing power parity exchange rate is the exchange rate based on the purchasing power parity (PPP) of a currency relative to a selected standard (usually the United States dollar). This is a comparative (and theoretical) exchange rate, the only way to directly realize this rate is to sell an entire CPI basket in one country, convert the cash at the currency market rate & then rebuy that same basket of goods in the other country (with the converted cash). Going from country to country, the distribution of prices within the basket will vary; typically, non-tradable purchases will consume a greater proportion of the basket's total cost in the higher GDP country, per the Balassa-Samuelson effect.

The ranking of countries may differ significantly based on which method is used.

  • The current exchange rate method converts the value of goods and services using global currency exchange rates. The method can offer better indications of a country's international purchasing power. For instance, if 10% of GDP is being spent on buying hi-tech foreign arms, the number of weapons purchased is entirely governed by current exchange rates, since arms are a traded product bought on the international market. There is no meaningful 'local' price distinct from the international price for high technology goods.
  • The purchasing power parity method accounts for the relative effective domestic purchasing power of the average producer or consumer within an economy. The method can provide a better indicator of the living standards especially of less developed countries, because it compensates for the weakness of local currencies in the international markets. It also offers better indication of total national wealth. For example, India ranks 10th by nominal GDP, but 3rd by PPP. The PPP method of GDP conversion is more relevant to non-traded goods and services. In the above example if hi-tech weapons are to be produced internally their amount will be governed by GDP(PPP) rather than nominal GDP.

There is a clear pattern of the purchasing power parity method decreasing the disparity in GDP between high and low income (GDP) countries, as compared to the current exchange rate method. This finding is called the Penn effect.


Fishers quantity theory of money

 Fisher's research into the basic theory of prices and interest rates did not touch directly on the great social issues of the day. On the other hand, his monetary economics did and this grew to be the main focus of Fisher’s mature work.

It was Fisher who (following the pioneering work of Simon Newcomb) formulated the quantity theory of money in terms of the "equation of exchange:" Let M be the total stock of money, P the price level, T the amount of transactions carried out using money, and V the velocity of circulation of money, so that

M V = P T

Later economists replaced T by the real output Y (or Q), usually quantified by the real Gross domestic product (GDP).

Fisher's Appreciation and Interest was an abstract analysis of the behavior of interest rates when the price level is changing. It emphasized the distinction between real and nominal interest rates:



where ris the real interest rate, iis the nominal interest rate, and the inflation \piis a measure of the increase in the price level. When inflation is sufficiently low, the real interest rate can be approximated as the nominal interest rate minus the expected inflation rate. The resulting equation is known as the Fisher equation in his honor.

Fisher believed that investors and savers – people in general – were afflicted in varying degrees by "money illusion"; they could not see past the money to the goods the money could buy. In an ideal world, changes in the price level would have no effect on production or employment. In the actual world with money illusion, inflation (and deflation) did serious harm. For more than forty years, Fisher elaborated his vision of the damaging “dance of the dollar” and devised various schemes to “stabilize” money, i.e. to stabilize the price level. He was one of the first to subject macroeconomic data, including the money stock, interest rates, and the price level, to statistical analyses and tests. In the 1920s, he introduced the technique later called distributed lags. In 1973, the Journal of Political Economy posthumously reprinted his 1926 paper on the statistical relation between unemployment and inflation, retitling it as "I discovered the Phillips curve". 

Index numbers played an important role in his monetary theory, and his book The Making of Index Numbers has remained influential down to the present day.

Fisher's main intellectual rival was the Swedish economist Knut Wicksell. Fisher espoused a more succinct explanation of the quantity theory of money, resting it almost exclusively on long run prices. Wicksell's theory was considerably more complicated, beginning with interest rates in a system of changes in the real economy. Although both economists concluded from their theories that at the heart of the business cycle (and economic crisis) was government monetary policy, their disagreement would not be solved in their lifetimes, and indeed, it was inherited by the policy debates between the Keynesians and monetarists beginning a half-century later.

Following the stock market crash of 1929, and in light of the ensuing Great Depression, Fisher developed a theory of economic crises called debt-deflation, which attributed the crises to the bursting of a credit bubble. According to Fisher, the bursting of the credit bubble unleashes a series of effects that have serious negative impact on the real economy:

  1. Debt liquidation and distress selling.
  2. Contraction of the money supply as bank loans are paid off.
  3. A fall in the level of asset prices.
  4. A still greater fall in the net worth of businesses, precipitating bankruptcies.
  5. A fall in profits.
  6. A reduction in output, in trade and in employment.
  7. Pessimism and loss of confidence.
  8. Hoarding of money.
  9. A fall in nominal interest rates and a rise in deflation-adjusted interest rates.