A service is the action of doing something for someone or something. It is largely intangible (i.e. not material). You cannot touch it. You cannot see it. You cannot taste it. You cannot hear it. You cannot feel it. So a service context creates its own series of challenges for the marketing manager since he or she must communicate the benefits of a service by drawing parallels with imagery and ideas that are more tangible.
Search quality is the perception in the mind of
the consumer of the quality of the product prior to purchase through making a
series of searches. So this is simple in relation to a tangible product because
you might look at size or colour for example. Therefore search quality relates
more to products
and services.
Experience quality is easier to assess. In terms
of service you need to taste the food or experience the service level. Therefore
your experiences allow you to evaluate the level and nature of the service. You
remember a great vacation because of the food or service, but by the same token
you remember an awful vacation because of the hopeless food or poor service.
Credence quality is based upon the credibility of
the service that you undertake. This is down to the reputation of a dentist or
of a decorator. Credence is used where you have little knowledge of the topic
and where you rely upon the professionalism of the expert.
Perishable
Perishable – in that once it has occurred it
cannot be repeated in exactly the same way. For example, once a 100 meters
Olympic final has been run, there will not be another for 4 more years, and
even then it will be staged in a different place with many different finalists.
You cannot put service in the warehouse, or store in your inventory. An
interesting argument about perishability goes like this, once a flight has
taken off you cannot sell that seat again, hence the airline makes no profit on
that seat. Therefore the airline has no choice but to price at peak when it
sells a seat at busy times in order to make a profit. That’s why restaurants
offer vouchers to compensate for quieter times, and it is the same for railway
tickets and matinees in Broadway during the middle of the week.
Variable
Variability- since the human involvement in
service provision means that no two services will be completely identical, they
are variable. For example, returning to the same garage time and time again for
a service on your car might see different levels of customer satisfaction, or
speediness of work. If you watch your favourite/favorite music group on DVD the
experience will be the same every time you play it, although if you go to see
them on tour when they are live no two performances will be identical for a
whole variety of reasons. Even with the greatly standardized McDonalds
experience, there are slight changes in service, often through no fault of the
business itself. Sometimes Saturday lunchtime will be extremely busy, on other
days you may have to wait to go via the drive through. So services tend to vary
from one user experience to another.
Homogeneous
Homogeneity is where services are largely the
same (the opposite of variability above). We considered McDonald’s above which
is a largely homogeneous service, so now let’s look at KFC and Pizza Hut. Both
of these businesses provide a homogeneous service experience whether you are in
New York, or Alaska, or even Adelaide. Consumers expect the same level of
service and would not anticipate any huge deviation in their experience.
Outside of the main brands you might expect a less homogeneous experience. If
you visit your doctor he or she might give one interpretation, whereas another
doctor might offer a different view. Your regular hairdresser will deliver a
style whereas a hairdresser in the next town could potentially style your hair
differently. Therefore standardization is largely embodied by the large global
brands which produce services.
Right of ownership is not taken to the service,
since you merely experience it. For example, an engineer may service your
air-conditioning, but you do not own the service, the engineer or his
equipment. You cannot sell it on once it has been consumed, and do not take ownership
of it.
Western economies have seen deterioration in
their traditional manufacturing industries, and a growth in their service
economies. Therefore the marketing mix has seen extended and adapted to create
the services marketing mix, also known as the 7P’s or the extended marketing
mix – physical evidence, process and people.
A product is tangible (i.e. material) since you
can touch it or own it. A service tends to be an experience that is consumed at
the point where it is purchased and cannot be owned since it quickly perishes.
A person could go to a café one day and enjoy excellent service, and then
return the next day and have a poor experience. Marketers talk about the nature
of a service as being inseparable, intangible, perishable, homogenous and
variable.
Inseparable
Inseparable – from the point where it is
consumed, and from the provider of the service. For example, you cannot take a
live theatre performance home to consume it (a DVD of the same performance
would be a product, not a service). The consumer is actually involved in the
production process that they are buying at the same time as it is being
produced, for example an eye test or a makeover. One benefit would be that if
you are unhappy with you makeover you can tell the beautician and that instant
feedback means that the service quality is improved. You can’t do that with a
product. Another attribute is that services have to be close to the person
consuming them i.e. goods can be made in a central factory location which has
the benefits of mass production. This localization means that consumption is
inseparable from production.
Intangible
Intangible – cannot have a real, physical
presence as does a product. For example, motor insurance may have a
certificate, but the financial service itself cannot be touched i.e. it is
intangible. This makes it tricky to evaluate the quality of service prior to
consuming it since there are fewer attributes of quality in comparison to a
product. One way is to consider quality in terms of search, experience and
credence.